From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Revell Subject: Re: [PATCH] HP nx6110 quirks Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 16:00:41 -0400 Message-ID: <1124568042.26949.41.camel@mindpipe> References: <20050820181730.GA12485@procyon.home> <1124563311.26949.23.camel@mindpipe> <20050820193431.GB12485@procyon.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050820193431.GB12485@procyon.home> Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Sergey Vlasov Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 23:34 +0400, Sergey Vlasov wrote: > Then we will need to create virtual controls - the chip has only two > volume control registers for this, so we will need to make three > virtual controls for volumes, then combine values and write them to > the chip. And this will need to be done inside the driver (otherwise > where the values of virtual controls will be stored while no ALSA > programs are running?). Would this be acceptable? Actually I was wrong, this is actually supposed to be handled by the new abstract mixer layer in alsa-lib. You're right, it does not make sense to make each mixer implement it. I don't think it's well documented yet but AFAIK it should work. Lee ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf