From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chris Notley" Subject: Re: (no subject) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:55:35 +0100 Message-ID: <1124970935.24801.241455397@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1124921733.4001.241416298@webmail.messagingengine.com> <430CF75A.1030105@lopsch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <430CF75A.1030105@lopsch.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:40:26 +0200, "Daniel Lopes" said: > netfilter@notleyc.fastmail.fm schrieb: > > Hi, > > > > I've been trying to apply Patrick McHardy's netfilter+ipsec patches to > > my > > 2.6.12-5 (from kernel.org) using patch-o-matic. When I try to apply any > > of > > the four patches I receive the following message: > > > > patchlets/ipsec-01-output-hooks has dependency on nf_reset, but nf_reset > > is > > not known > > > > I've probably missed something obvious, but I've hit a dead end, any > > help > > would be appreciated. > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > I've read somewhere deleting the dependency in the info file should let > apply the patch cleanly. The other hooks for example hook number x > depend on the hook x-1. So if the 01 hook applies cleanly the others > should do aswell. > Thanks Daniel, that did the trick! Cheers, Chris