All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Zhang <mingz@ele.uri.edu>
To: Mirko Benz <mirko.benz@web.de>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>,
	Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID 5 write performance advice
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:26:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1125066393.5549.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <430ECA18.10405@web.de>

seems i need to change the mail thread to 

"why my RAID0 write speed so slow!" :P

i also use a Marvell 8 port PCI-X card. 8 SATA DISK RAID0, each single
disk can give me around 55MB/s, but the RAID0 can only give me 203MB/s.
I tried different io scheduler, all lead to same write speed at my side.

02:01.0 SCSI storage controller: Marvell MV88SX5081 8-port SATA I PCI-X
Controller (rev 03)
        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV+ VGASnoop-
ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B-
        Status: Cap+ 66Mhz+ UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-
        Latency: 32, Cache Line Size 08
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 24
        Region 0: Memory at fa000000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable)
        Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2
                Flags: PMEClk+ DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME
(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
                Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
        Capabilities: [50] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+
Queue=0/0 Enable-
                Address: 0000000000000000  Data: 0000
        Capabilities: [60] PCI-X non-bridge device.
                Command: DPERE- ERO- RBC=0 OST=3
                Status: Bus=2 Dev=1 Func=0 64bit+ 133MHz+ SCD- USC-,
DC=simple, DMMRBC=0, DMOST=3, DMCRS=0, RSCEM-


On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 09:51 +0200, Mirko Benz wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> We have created a RAID 0 for the same environment:
> Personalities : [raid0] [raid5]
> md0 : active raid0 sdi[7] sdh[6] sdg[5] sdf[4] sde[3] sdd[2] sdc[1] sdb[0]
>       1250326528 blocks 64k chunks
> 

Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] [multipath] [raid6]
[raid10] [faulty]
md0 : active raid0 sdh[7] sdg[6] sdf[5] sde[4] sdd[3] sdc[2] sdb[1] sda
[0]
      3125690368 blocks 64k chunks


SCSI disks: 400GB SATA

host: scsi11 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
  Vendor: Hitachi  Model: HDS724040KLSA80  Rev: KFAO
  Type:   Direct-Access                    ANSI SCSI revision: 03



> *** dd TEST ***
> 
> time dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0 bs=1M
> 14967373824 bytes transferred in 32,060497 seconds (466847843 bytes/sec)
> 
> iostat 5 output:
> avg-cpu:  %user   %nice    %sys %iowait   %idle
>            0,00    0,00   89,60    9,50    0,90
> 
> Device:            tps   Blk_read/s   Blk_wrtn/s   Blk_read   Blk_wrtn
> hda               0,00         0,00         0,00          0          0
> sda               0,00         0,00         0,00          0          0
> sdb             455,31         0,00    116559,52          0     581632
> sdc             455,51         0,00    116540,28          0     581536
> sdd             450,10         0,00    116545,09          0     581560
> sde             454,11         0,00    116559,52          0     581632
> sdf             452,30         0,00    116559,52          0     581632
> sdg             454,71         0,00    116553,11          0     581600
> sdh             453,31         0,00    116533,87          0     581504
> sdi             453,91         0,00    116556,31          0     581616
> sdj               0,00         0,00         0,00          0          0
> sdk               0,00         0,00         0,00          0          0
> sdl               0,00         0,00         0,00          0          0
> sdm               0,00         0,00         0,00          0          0
> sdn               0,00         0,00         0,00          0          0
> md0           116556,11         0,00    932448,90          0    4652920
> 
> Comments: 466 MB / 8 = 58,25 MB/s which is about the same as a dd to a 
> single disk (58,5 MB/s). So the controller + I/O subsystem is not the 
> bottleneck.
> 
> Regards,
> Mirko
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-26 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-08-24  8:24 RAID 5 write performance advice Mirko Benz
2005-08-24 12:46 ` Ming Zhang
2005-08-24 13:43   ` Mirko Benz
2005-08-24 13:49     ` Ming Zhang
2005-08-24 21:32     ` Neil Brown
2005-08-25 16:38       ` Mirko Benz
2005-08-25 16:54         ` Ming Zhang
2005-08-26  7:51           ` Mirko Benz
2005-08-26 14:26             ` Ming Zhang [this message]
2005-08-26 14:30             ` Ming Zhang
2005-08-26 15:29               ` Mirko Benz
2005-08-26 17:05                 ` Ming Zhang
2005-08-28 23:28                 ` Neil Brown
2005-09-01 19:44         ` djani22

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1125066393.5549.22.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=mingz@ele.uri.edu \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mirko.benz@web.de \
    --cc=neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.