From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Mateusz Berezecki <mateuszb@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6 context switching and posix threads performance question
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:38:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1125146282.20161.69.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aec8d6fc050827053047b1b667@mail.gmail.com>
Group replies work best with mailing lists.
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 14:30 +0200, Mateusz Berezecki wrote:
> On 8/27/05, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
>
> > Well the obvious question is: what kernel version and which thread
> > library?
>
> Ah, sorry I just forgot to put this info
>
> Linux blade1 2.6.12 #1 SMP Tue Jul 26 08:43:57 GMT 2005 i686 Intel(R)
> Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
>
> the cpu is with HT so Linux thinks there are 4 cpus on board
>
> >
> > 2.4 with LinuxThreads might have severe problems. However 2.6 with NPTL
> > should be able to handle it, IIRC Igno once did a million threads with
_Ingo_ Molnar that is; I really should have gotten those 4 letters in
the right order by now, humble appologies.
> > that combination just to show that it worked ;-).
>
> Yes, but how about switching contexts and the performance impact?
> Will it slowdown the whole system or just result in low or medium
> overhead?.
> These threads are meant to be running an intensive network connection
> and possibly analysing the dataflow and maybe filtering some stuff.
> Each thread doing the same task.
I think it should work; however I'm not the most qualified to answer
this.
--
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-27 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-27 12:11 Linux 2.6 context switching and posix threads performance question Mateusz Berezecki
2005-08-27 12:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <aec8d6fc050827053047b1b667@mail.gmail.com>
2005-08-27 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2005-08-27 12:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-08-27 13:09 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-27 14:43 ` Alan Cox
2005-08-28 23:20 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2005-08-30 17:46 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1125146282.20161.69.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mateuszb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.