From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [Adeos-main] adeos i386 and ppc patches forward ported to 2.6.13 From: Stelian Pop In-Reply-To: <20050901155220.ifckrl94w00gksg8@domain.hid> References: <1125495609.4643.16.camel@domain.hid> <20050831193733.w5f2d662w0gswwkg@domain.hid> <20050831211425.GA32230@domain.hid> <20050901104750.c0mpu3q4pkc088wg@domain.hid> <1125577206.4641.8.camel@domain.hid> <1125579791.4685.2.camel@domain.hid> <4316FD8F.30203@domain.hid> <1125581425.4639.3.camel@domain.hid> <20050901155220.ifckrl94w00gksg8@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 16:12:43 +0200 Message-Id: <1125583963.4635.0.camel@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: General discussion about Adeos List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe Gerum Cc: adeos-main@gna.org, Heikki Lindholm Le jeudi 01 septembre 2005 =C3=A0 15:52 +0200, Philippe Gerum a =C3=A9cri= t : > >> Are you sure this is not the same I was experiencing, eg. missed > >> decrementer interrupt that stalls the machine (looks like hard lock-= up) > >> for two minutes. > > > > I tried waiting (at least 5 minutes) and nothing happened. > > >=20 > Here is a revisited version of Heikki's patch applicable against an > Adeos-patched kernel, and which is expected to solve the lagging=20 > interrupt sync > issue; tested on a mpc8541 board. I'd be interested to know if this=20 > still fixes > the issue discovered on ppc64, and maybe on the G4. Does not change a thing on the G4. Stelian. --=20 Stelian Pop