From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [RFC] Cleaning up /proc/xen Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 13:59:48 -0500 Message-ID: <1126205988.32272.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <431F97CC.9080007@us.ibm.com> <5d7aca9505090801093be48e74@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5d7aca9505090801093be48e74@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: NAHieu Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 17:09 +0900, NAHieu wrote: > The good thing about /proc is that we do not need to register any > major/minor stuffs (which is very annoying), like what we do with > device. It's much less annoying if you just don't rely on static major/minor numbers and require udev. > So I vote for moving things to under /sys. But hold on, that would not > be compatible with others OS like *BSD, correct ? There's also plan9 and other things to consider. I reckon it's better to just implement first class drivers in each OS. Regards, Anthony Liguori > > Thanks, > Hieu. >