From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1EFdox-0007jZ-SB for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:25:31 -0700 Received: from mail.nagafix.co.uk ([213.228.237.37]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EFdow-0002rP-Gf for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:25:31 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nagafix.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2387A4576D for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 03:32:07 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.nagafix.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (viper.nagafix.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10211-08 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 03:32:06 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (host-87-74-41-116.bulldogdsl.com [87.74.41.116]) by mail.nagafix.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCD94576C for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 03:32:06 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [uml-devel] pcap - FIXED From: antoine In-Reply-To: <200509142206.12128.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> References: <1126653933.3769.45.camel@localhost> <1126729188.3769.49.camel@localhost> <200509142206.12128.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1126730694.3769.58.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:44:54 +0100 To: UML devel > > [42949414.170000] dev_ip_addr - device not assigned an IP address Yes, I was wondering about this one. The device has got an IP assigned and it is up... > I'd care more to this one probably. Especially because you say "on some > setups". It should refer to the host interface (don't know which one). > > [42949414.170000] pcap_open : pcap_compile failed - 'syntax error' > This could be bogus. Actually it isn't. This forced me to check my syntax... > > [42949414.170000] device eth1 entered promiscuous mode > > [42949414.170000] dev_ip_addr - device not assigned an IP address > > [42949414.170000] pcap_open : pcap_compile failed - 'syntax error' > It'd be on the PCAP filter expression (there's a parameter for that), assuming > the message is correct. > > If you find no other explaination, I'll look if UML is passing a bogus string > there - however check the rest first. Thanks. Found it, the startup scripts on the broken setups were passing a 'null' filter expression (from a database) rather than leaving it empty. Works fine now. Sorry for the line noise... Antoine ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel