From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peggy Kam Subject: iptables rules Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:22:15 -0400 Message-ID: <1126797736.4790.24.camel@ndspc131.p.n-dsi.com> References: <1123184190.21749.34.camel@ndspc131.p.n-dsi.com> <1123704837.3708.1.camel@ndspc131.p.n-dsi.com> <1126649450.4790.5.camel@ndspc131.p.n-dsi.com> Reply-To: ppkam@n-dsi.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1126649450.4790.5.camel@ndspc131.p.n-dsi.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hi, I have defined the following firewall rule in iptables: iptables -I FORWARD -s 192.168.22.102 -d 192.168.1.112 -p tcp -m tcp -m multiport --ports 22,23,24,25 -j ACCEPT why were the packets able to get to 192.168.1.112 on port 22 when the packets does not even come from ports 22,23,24 or 25? Thanks in advance, Peggy