From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 11:51:21 +0100
Message-ID: <1127127081.22124.12.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <200509182004.j8IK4JNx012764@inti.inf.utfsm.cl>
	 <432E5024.20709@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-26073-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <432E5024.20709@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Horst von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>, thenewme91@gmail.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Denis Vlasenko <vda@ilport.com.ua>, chriswhite@gentoo.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

On Sul, 2005-09-18 at 22:44 -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> We are supposed to write a filesystem so that overheating CPUs do not
> make it crash?

The reverse - and before you lose data.

> I think Alan Cox is the only poster who has no intention of using
> Reiser4 but said at one point that he thinks it should go in.

If its clean enough then yes, like any other fs. Until then no.