From: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
To: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] cogito: Don't ever assume object type in cg-object-id
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:37:59 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1127403479.14856.13.camel@dv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050922094643.GC21019@pasky.or.cz>
Hi, Petr!
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 11:46 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> $ git-fsck-objects
> error: b3e9704ecdf48869f635f0aa99ddfb513f885aff: object not found
>
> and some dangling stuff, that's all I get. This seems to be caused by
> the mere existence of that (empty) file, so I just removed it from the
> objects database and all is fine now.
Maybe kernel.org site is not in sync yet, but anyway, here's what I
found.
I ran this script:
[proski@dv cogito]$ for i in .git/refs/tags/*; do git-tar-tree `cat $i` >/dev/null || echo $i; done
fatal: not a reference to a tag, commit or tree object: 463d05c7c4fe7f24da29749f4c7f25893fc20b8c
.git/refs/tags/git-pasky-0.1
fatal: not a reference to a tag, commit or tree object: 2c70421be7d88fbee49986d7a5584d1f010a25de
.git/refs/tags/git-pasky-0.2
fatal: not a reference to a tag, commit or tree object: d14925c87cdb6ca6345bcb3c8e34a2d659c79451
.git/refs/tags/git-pasky-0.3
If I delete the bad tags and prune the tree, git-fsck-objects has
nothing to complain about:
[proski@dv cogito]$ rm .git/refs/tags/git-pasky-0.1
[proski@dv cogito]$ rm .git/refs/tags/git-pasky-0.2
[proski@dv cogito]$ rm .git/refs/tags/git-pasky-0.3
[proski@dv cogito]$ git-prune origin `cat .git/refs/tags/*`
[proski@dv cogito]$ git-fsck-objects
[proski@dv cogito]$
That's probably what you should do on the master tree if you haven't
done it.
I can run "git-prune origin", but then cg-fetch would refetch objects
for more tags:
Missing object of tag cogito-0.12... retrieved
Missing object of tag cogito-0.12.1... retrieved
Missing object of tag cogito-0.13... retrieved
Missing object of tag cogito-0.14... retrieved
Missing object of tag cogito-0.14.1... retrieved
Missing object of tag cogito-0.14.2... retrieved
Missing object of tag cogito-0.15... retrieved
Missing object of tag git-pasky-0.1... retrieved
Missing object of tag git-pasky-0.2... retrieved
Missing object of tag git-pasky-0.3... retrieved
How come that cogito-0.12 - cogito-0.15 are not on the origin tree, but
older cogito tags are?
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-22 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-20 2:25 [PATCH 6/8] cogito: Don't ever assume object type in cg-object-id Pavel Roskin
2005-09-21 10:00 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-22 3:27 ` Pavel Roskin
2005-09-22 9:46 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-22 9:52 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-22 15:37 ` Pavel Roskin [this message]
2005-09-22 15:50 ` Petr Baudis
2005-09-22 16:55 ` Pavel Roskin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1127403479.14856.13.camel@dv \
--to=proski@gnu.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasky@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.