From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Briggs Subject: Re: iosched (was Re: Full of surprises - A reiser4 story from userland) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:20:36 -0600 Message-ID: <1127946036.10565.111.camel@localhost> References: <1127914812.12894.96.camel@laptop> <200509281825.49873.vitaly@namesys.com> <1127921286.12894.106.camel@laptop> <433ABD7B.1010903@slaphack.com> <1127932340.12894.149.camel@laptop> <5d8b7b90509281213c95e30c@mail.gmail.com> <200509281952.j8SJq9Uo007371@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <433AFDF6.3070404@namesys.com> <5a59ce53050928143267c9d779@mail.gmail.com> <5a59ce53050928143341084b5b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7+ZpHAkX6YuBf6+vUpux" Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <5a59ce53050928143341084b5b@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: To: studdugie Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com --=-7+ZpHAkX6YuBf6+vUpux Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 17:33 -0400, studdugie wrote: > On 9/28/05, Hans Reiser wrote: > > Check out the latest cfq in the latest kernel, it is much better than > > the others for most applications. Anticipatory used to be the best, bu= t > > cfq-3 is better now. > > > When you say the best is that a general conclusion for both single > disks and RAID? I find (but no hard data to provide) that no-op or deadline seems to work best when working with an intelligent RAID controller. Just push the queue to the controller and it'll sort out the best way to get things. --=20 Jonathan Briggs eSoft, Inc. --=-7+ZpHAkX6YuBf6+vUpux Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDOxc0G8fHaOLTWwgRAqvTAJ9vD9glAI6WcKw+QOzPzbM3s6TsQQCfXPJ9 Roz/b4+97/4CciBSdbVEjQU= =XDir -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7+ZpHAkX6YuBf6+vUpux--