From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jake Maciejewski <maciejej@msoe.edu>
Subject: Re: reiser4 for 2.6.13 is available on our website
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 17:09:53 -0500
Message-ID: <1128031794.10856.155.camel@gentoo>
References: <433C23A2.9020403@namesys.com>  <op.sxvmrokbd4os1z@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-26343-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <op.sxvmrokbd4os1z@localhost>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz?= Mierzwa <prymitive@pcserwis.net>
Cc: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, "reiserfs-list@namesys.com" <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>

I get the same with 2.6.13.2 and gcc 3.4.4 on amd64

On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 20:24 +0200, =A3ukasz Mierzwa wrote:
> Dnia Thu, 29 Sep 2005 19:25:54 +0200, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> =20
> napisa=B3:
>=20
> > Reiser4 performance dropped in the -mm series due to the write
> > throttling patch and also dropped due to a fixed bug (removing type saf=
e
> > lists added a bug).  We don't yet know if we got quite all the
> > performance back, we are still testing.  Conservative users should wait
> > a week or two to see if bug reports with reiser4 remain, or if indeed w=
e
> > did get all the bugs out  of the recent cleanup patch.
> >
> > Hans
>=20
>    CC      fs/proc/kmsg.o
>    CC      fs/proc/proc_tty.o
>    CC      fs/proc/proc_misc.o
>    CC      fs/proc/kcore.o
>    LD      fs/proc/proc.o
>    LD      fs/proc/built-in.o
>    CC      fs/ramfs/inode.o
>    LD      fs/ramfs/ramfs.o
>    LD      fs/ramfs/built-in.o
>    CC      fs/reiser4/debug.o
> In file included from fs/reiser4/lock.h:15,
>                   from fs/reiser4/context.h:14,
>                   from fs/reiser4/debug.c:25:
> fs/reiser4/txnmgr.h: In function 'spin_atom_init':
> fs/reiser4/txnmgr.h:512: error: duplicate case value
> fs/reiser4/txnmgr.h:512: error: previously used here
> fs/reiser4/txnmgr.h: In function 'spin_txnh_init':
> fs/reiser4/txnmgr.h:513: error: duplicate case value
> fs/reiser4/txnmgr.h:513: error: previously used here
> fs/reiser4/txnmgr.h: In function 'spin_txnmgr_init':
> fs/reiser4/txnmgr.h:514: error: duplicate case value
> fs/reiser4/txnmgr.h:514: error: previously used here
> In file included from fs/reiser4/context.h:14,
>                   from fs/reiser4/debug.c:25:
> fs/reiser4/lock.h: In function 'spin_stack_init':
> fs/reiser4/lock.h:198: error: duplicate case value
> fs/reiser4/lock.h:198: error: previously used here
> In file included from fs/reiser4/znode.h:16,
>                   from fs/reiser4/tree.h:15,
>                   from fs/reiser4/super.h:9,
>                   from fs/reiser4/debug.c:26:
> fs/reiser4/jnode.h: In function 'spin_jnode_init':
> fs/reiser4/jnode.h:344: error: duplicate case value
> fs/reiser4/jnode.h:344: error: previously used here
> fs/reiser4/jnode.h: In function 'spin_jload_init':
> fs/reiser4/jnode.h:348: error: duplicate case value
> fs/reiser4/jnode.h:348: error: previously used here
> In file included from fs/reiser4/super.h:9,
>                   from fs/reiser4/debug.c:26:
> fs/reiser4/tree.h: In function 'spin_epoch_init':
> fs/reiser4/tree.h:169: error: duplicate case value
> fs/reiser4/tree.h:169: error: previously used here
> In file included from fs/reiser4/debug.c:26:
> fs/reiser4/super.h: In function 'spin_super_init':
> fs/reiser4/super.h:379: error: duplicate case value
> fs/reiser4/super.h:379: error: previously used here
> make[2]: *** [fs/reiser4/debug.o] B=B3=B1d 1
> make[1]: *** [fs/reiser4] B=B3=B1d 2
> make: *** [fs] B=B3=B1d 2
>=20
> amd64 gentoo box running gcc 4.0.1, 2.6.13 + reiser4-for-2.6.13-1.patch.g=
z
--=20
Jake Maciejewski <maciejej@msoe.edu>