All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erik Slagter <erik@slagter.name>
To: Mark Hahn <hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problems with Promise SATAII TX4
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:29:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1128940153.4775.48.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0510081259090.28615-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1226 bytes --]

On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 13:06 -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
> > I'm not sure why the system needs more than 430W, but with the new
> 
> unfortunately, total watts is inadequate for characterizing a PSU.
> it's about like classifying cars by how tall they are.
> 
> in particular, many non-server higher-watt PSU's are designed to provide
> extra power for systems which consume power mainly on the CPU/video voltages,
> and may not provide enough power for disks.  further, modern motherboards
> have voltage converters for the CPU and video which are less sensitive 
> to power quality, and will thus "brownout" some power buses.  after all, 
> a typical CPU wants 1.5V or so at an obscene current.  disk electronics, 
> as far as I have seen, tend to treat their supply as clean and regulated.

BTW my system has a 300W PSU but consumes about 195W according to a
power meter on the primary (230V) side. Which of course is only
comparable up to a certain level.

Also BTW note that besides a total max power, PSU's also have ratings
per voltage and some even per outlet. Maybe that's where the pain comes
from ;-)

A nice "bogus power" error message in the (S)ATA standard would have
been ehrm... beneficial.

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 2115 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-10 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-30  0:10 Problems with Promise SATAII TX4 Kim Roland Rasmussen
2005-03-31 20:34 ` Joe Harvell
2005-08-18  3:46 ` Fabian Knittel
2005-08-23 12:58   ` Fabian Knittel
2005-10-08 13:12     ` Fabian Knittel
2005-10-08 17:06       ` Mark Hahn
2005-10-10 10:29         ` Erik Slagter [this message]
2005-10-10 10:23       ` Erik Slagter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1128940153.4775.48.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=erik@slagter.name \
    --cc=hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.