From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart De Schuymer Subject: Re: x_tables vs. nf-hipac Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:18:49 +0000 Message-ID: <1129051129.3378.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <434A4B11.4030103@gmx.net> <20051010163442.GC5627@rama> <1128983497.3377.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Henrik Nordstrom In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Op di, 11-10-2005 te 14:27 +0200, schreef Henrik Nordstrom: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Bart De Schuymer wrote: > > > Nice to see this move forward. If you want to put the arptables > > userspace tool into the netfilter tree > > How different is the arptables userspace tool from the iptables userspace > tool? It doesn't differ much, most code was copied without changes from iptables. This was done a lot of months ago, so all changes to iptables since then are not reflected in arptables. One thing though is that it needs to distinguish between 2.4 and 2.6 kernels (the latter having the arptables FORWARD chain). cheers, Bart