From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ted Kaczmarek <tedkaz@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: Daily Xen Builds
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 16:15:57 -0400
Message-ID: <1129061757.16017.46.camel@pluto.linsolutions.com>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D32E2F7@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
	<87d5mcj8in.fsf@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-reply-to: <87d5mcj8in.fsf@us.ibm.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Dan Smith <danms@us.ibm.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 09:58 -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
> IP> Well, one thing we will need to watchout for is checkins to
> IP> xm-test that add tests that currently fail.
> 
> Do you mean tests that exercise things that we know don't work at the
> moment?  Would it be sufficient to make sure that those tests are
> marked as XFAIL?
> 
> I'm very glad to hear about the automated testing-before-pushing
> plans.  It sounds great!

I second that :-)

Regards,
Ted