From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932373AbVJLQLT (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:11:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932401AbVJLQLT (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:11:19 -0400 Received: from mtagate3.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.152]:39339 "EHLO mtagate3.de.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932373AbVJLQLS (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:11:18 -0400 Subject: Re: modalias entries for ccw devices From: Martin Schwidefsky Reply-To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com To: Bastian Blank Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20051012154844.GA10587@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> References: <20051012141218.GA4039@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <1129127818.32420.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051012154844.GA10587@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 18:11:12 +0200 Message-Id: <1129133472.32420.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 17:48 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > No, but as far as I can tell after glancing at the modalias > > implementation in usb this would make sense for ccw as well. > > Hmm, I don't find device tables in ctc.ko and lcs.ko, can that be fixed > at the same time? That is because ctc and lcs are group device drivers. The ccw device driver is the cu3088 driver. You'll get an lcs/ctc device by "grouping" two of the cu3088 device together. > Hmm, something else. Wasn't there a cu type or device type clash between > escon and lcs, or was that only related to chan types reported by the > 2.4 kernels? Yes, the 2.6 group devices have emerged from the 2.4 chandev devices (and thank god that we got rid of that junk). -- blue skies, Martin Martin Schwidefsky Linux for zSeries Development & Services IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH