From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David F Barrera Subject: Re: Daily Xen Builds Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:27:40 -0500 Message-ID: <1129231660.5978.60.camel@dbarrera_tp> References: <1129142873.5982.12.camel@dbarrera_tp> <8764s2edei.fsf@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8764s2edei.fsf@us.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Daniel Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 12:36 -0700, Dan Smith wrote: > Just a comment about these results: > > > Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL | > > ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+ > > FC3pae | 78 | 10 | 0 | 1 | > > hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 55 | 33 | 0 | 1 | > > hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 | 66 | 20 | 0 | 1 | > > hs20.fc4_x86_64 | 56 | 32 | 0 | 1 | > > x235sles9nonpae | 77 | 9 | 0 | 1 | > > x305rh4pae | 76 | 11 | 0 | 1 | > > x305sles9nonpae | 53 | 32 | 0 | 1 | > > x335fc4pae | 64 | 24 | 0 | 1 | > > The above list of PASS/FAIL results was generated with an old version > of xm-test because I forgot to update the link that David pulls from > last night. In tomorrow's report, we should see fewer failures, and > most marked as expected. Dan, Are we seeing fewer failure? It appears to be similar, or slightly more. SUMMARY*: Platform | PASS | FAIL | XPASS | XFAIL | ---------------------+------+------+-------+-------+ FC3pae | 77 | 12 | 2 | 6 | hs20.1.sles9-x86_64 | 60 | 27 | 2 | 6 | hs20.2.sles9-x86_64 | 59 | 28 | 1 | 7 | hs20.fc4_x86_64 | 78 | 11 | 2 | 6 | x235sles9nonpae | 77 | 9 | 0 | 1 | x305rh4pae | 79 | 9 | 3 | 5 | x305sles9nonpae | 53 | 32 | 0 | 1 | > -- Regards, David F Barrera Linux Technology Center Systems and Technology Group, IBM "The wisest men follow their own direction. " Euripides