From: gfiala@s.netic.de
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: large files unnecessary trashing filesystem cache?
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 13:10:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1129720232.435629a8753d3@webmail.LF.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051018213721.236b2107.akpm@osdl.org>
Zitat von Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>:
> An obvious approach would be an LD_PRELOAD thingy which modifies read() and
> write(), perhaps controlled via an environment variable. AFAIK nobody has
> even attempted this.
Sounds interesting.
> A decent kernel implementation would be to add a max_resident_pages to
> struct file_struct and to use that to perform drop-behind within read() and
> write(). That's a bit of arithmetic and a call to
> invalidate_mapping_pages(). The userspace interface to that could be a
> linux-specific extension to posix_fadvise() or to fcntl().
Would still like to have a way to configure a "default file policy/heuristics"
for the system, just like i can choose IO-scheduler.
>
> But that still requires that all the applications be modified.
>
> So I'd also suggest a new resource limit which, if set, is copied into the
> applications's file_structs on open(). So you then write a little wrapper
> app which does setrlimit()+exec():
>
> limit-cache-usage -s 1000 my-fave-backup-program <args>
>
> Which will cause every file which my-fave-backup-program reads or writes to
> be limited to a maximum pagecache residency of 1000 kbytes.
Or make it another 'ulimit' parameter...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-19 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-18 20:01 large files unnecessary trashing filesystem cache? Guido Fiala
2005-10-18 20:48 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-20 15:23 ` Guido Fiala
2005-10-19 3:02 ` Andrew James Wade
2005-10-19 4:37 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-19 5:45 ` Andrew James Wade
2005-10-19 11:01 ` gfiala
2005-10-19 11:10 ` gfiala [this message]
2005-10-19 15:54 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-10-19 19:49 ` Andrew Morton
2005-10-19 22:26 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-20 6:28 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-10-19 4:10 ` Lee Revell
2005-10-19 15:43 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-19 17:58 ` Guido Fiala
2005-10-19 18:43 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-10-19 18:52 ` Guido Fiala
[not found] <4Z5WG-1iM-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4Z6zs-27l-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-10-18 21:58 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-10-18 23:05 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-10-19 0:20 ` David Lang
2005-10-19 0:33 ` Fawad Lateef
2005-10-19 1:42 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-10-19 7:23 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-10-19 11:06 ` gfiala
2005-10-19 13:43 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1129720232.435629a8753d3@webmail.LF.net \
--to=gfiala@s.netic.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.