From: Ted Kaczmarek <tedkaz@optonline.net>
To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: RE: monolithic versus modules
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:37:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1130449052.955.423.camel@pluto.linsolutions.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D32E622@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 21:45 +0100, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > I spun a new xen kernel from pristine sources using modules,
> > had the APCI errors and scsi timeouts.
> >
> > I took pristine source and spun a monolithic kernel and
> > everything appears to be working.
> >
> >
> > gcc version 3.4.4 20050721 (Red Hat 3.4.4-2) if it matter.
> >
> > xen_changeset : Wed Oct 26 11:59:13 2005 +0100 7500:20d1a79ebe31
> >
> > I have had this APCI issue on this SMP Athlon with modules
> > for a while now.
> >
> > Guess I will stick with monolithic kernels for xen for now.
>
> OK, this is interesting. Are you 100% sure about this? Are you sure you
> were remebering to install the new module set and make a new initrd?
> This is 32b non PAE, right?
>
> Its hard to see why we'd have a bug like this, but it might explain why
> we haven't had any luck reproing your woes.
>
I am 99.99% sure, just to be 100% I am going to do another pristine
module spin. This is indeed odd as one would assume everyone is using
modules for server type iron. I also got bit by the xen-br0 to xenbr0
change, xm create should have slapped me for thhis.
I was holding this email up until I spun a module one again but..
[tazman@pluto ~]$ telnet xenbits.xensource.com 80
Trying 217.147.82.57...
telnet: connect to address 217.147.82.57: Network is unreachable
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Network is unreachable
My hg co is failing :-(
Regards,
Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-27 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-27 20:45 monolithic versus modules Ian Pratt
2005-10-27 21:37 ` Ted Kaczmarek [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-28 1:03 Ian Pratt
2005-10-28 11:02 ` Ted Kaczmarek
2005-10-27 17:43 Ted Kaczmarek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1130449052.955.423.camel@pluto.linsolutions.com \
--to=tedkaz@optonline.net \
--cc=m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.