From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Alejandro Bonilla Beeche <abonilla@linuxwireless.org>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 4GB memory and Intel Dual-Core system
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:02:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1130763759.9145.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4365920D.2080009@linuxwireless.org>
On Sul, 2005-10-30 at 20:39 -0700, Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
> I guess you are right and wrong. The architecture has the limitation,
> the chipset as well and the OS. According to this document, it is the
> fault of the architecture as well as it requires to support addressing
> which is not available *stock*, only several other providers have added
> such "mapping" to get a better use of the memory.
That document reads like a "don't blame us because we didn't bother to
do remapping". That is an Intel business decision not a hardware limit,
as is shown by other vendors whose hardware can do the remap.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-31 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-27 20:33 4GB memory and Intel Dual-Core system Marcel Holtmann
2005-10-27 20:44 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-27 20:51 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-10-27 20:54 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-27 21:00 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-10-27 21:06 ` Roland Dreier
2005-10-27 21:08 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-10-27 21:10 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-10-27 20:57 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-10-27 20:54 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-10-27 20:57 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-10-27 21:02 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-10-27 21:07 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-10-27 21:15 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-10-27 21:19 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-10-27 22:26 ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-10-27 22:05 ` Dave Jones
2005-10-27 22:09 ` Vladimir Lazarenko
2005-11-02 16:21 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-10-27 22:11 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-10-27 22:12 ` Dave Jones
2005-10-27 22:17 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-10-27 22:20 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-10-28 0:33 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-10-30 22:26 ` Alan Cox
2005-10-31 3:39 ` Alejandro Bonilla Beeche
2005-10-31 13:02 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2005-10-31 23:03 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-11-01 5:03 ` thockin
2005-10-27 22:29 ` Joel Jaeggli
2005-10-27 22:13 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-10-27 22:18 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-10-28 2:35 ` Fawad Lateef
2005-10-28 3:09 ` Joel Jaeggli
2005-10-28 7:19 ` Fawad Lateef
2005-10-28 15:56 ` Joe Bob Spamtest
2005-10-28 15:29 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-10-28 15:45 ` Alejandro Bonilla
2005-10-28 16:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2005-10-30 22:24 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-02 16:20 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-10-27 22:12 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-27 21:09 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-10-27 21:32 ` Bernd Eckenfels
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-28 20:58 Lukas Hejtmanek
2005-10-29 3:32 ` Dave Jones
2005-10-29 11:15 ` Marcel Holtmann
2005-10-30 6:49 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1130763759.9145.7.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=abonilla@linuxwireless.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.