From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@nosferatu.za.org>
To: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>,
Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: initramfs for /dev/console with udev?
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 02:26:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1131150394.9669.11.camel@lycan.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200511041710.36752.rob@landley.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1250 bytes --]
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 17:10 -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Friday 04 November 2005 15:39, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> > > Ok, I remember why I stopped playing with klibc now. It's still deep in
> > > alpha-test stage, requires way more incestuous knowledge of the kernel
> > > headers than anything not bundled with the kernel itself has any excuse
> > > for, and I'm still not sure what advantage it claims to have over uClibc
> > > except for being BSD licensed.
> >
> > Well, apparently the plan is to eventually bundle it with the kernel if
> > not mistaken. Also, it have seen a stable release, and it works well
> > for what it was intended for, and still have a less footprint than
> > uClibc if space is really an issue.
>
> *shrug*. It only does static linking and uClibc can static link too. But
> there are no plans to bundle uClibc with the kernel. :)
>
It can link dynamic ...
-----
$ readelf -a /usr/lib64/klibc/bin/sh | grep -2 INTERP | tail -n 3
INTERP 0x0000000000000190 0x0000000000400190 0x0000000000400190
0x000000000000002a 0x000000000000002a R 1
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/klibc-zbHWOqxodx0Aind6t75AzMTNE9c.so]
-----
--
Martin Schlemmer
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-05 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-02 22:20 initramfs for /dev/console with udev? Robert Schwebel
2005-11-03 3:40 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-03 6:47 ` Robert Schwebel
2005-11-03 17:38 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-03 18:51 ` Robert Schwebel
2005-11-03 19:13 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-03 19:57 ` Roland Dreier
2005-11-03 21:00 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-03 21:29 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-04 21:39 ` Martin Schlemmer
2005-11-04 23:10 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-04 23:11 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-05 0:26 ` Martin Schlemmer [this message]
2005-11-05 2:56 ` Rob Landley
2005-11-03 21:41 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1131150394.9669.11.camel@lycan.lan \
--to=azarah@nosferatu.za.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r.schwebel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=rolandd@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.