From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: Panic on boot PPC64 / e1000 for 2.6.14-git10 & 2.6.14-mm1
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:11:06 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1131397866.4652.50.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051107123919.3c226b80.akpm@osdl.org>
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 12:39 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org> wrote:
e1000 did a config space access which caused a hash miss (probably when
accessing the IO space) which blew up in the hashing
(.hash_page_do_lazy_icache called from __hash_page_4K).
I think the bug is a mistake on my side:
.hash_page_do_lazy_icache() used to begin with:
if (!pfn_valid(pte_pfn(pte)))
return pp;
And that got lost. It needs to go back in. I'll send a patch later today
(I'm at home without the necessary stuff at hand).
Ben.
> > Power 4 LPAR panics on boot. -git9 was fine.
> >
> > Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Driver - version 6.1.16-k2
> > Copyright (c) 1999-2005 Intel Corporation.
> > Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> > SMP NR_CPUS=32 NUMA PSERIES LPAR
> > Modules linked in:
> > NIP: C00000000002F4A4 LR: C00000000002F7C8 CTR: C00000000030FA08
> > REGS: c00000003ffcb0d0 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (2.6.14-git10-autokern1)
> > MSR: 8000000000001032 <ME,IR,DR> CR: 48004088 XER: 20000000
> > DAR: C00000078002EEC8, DSISR: 0000000040010000
> > TASK = c00000077ffd07c0[1] 'swapper' THREAD: c00000003ffc8000 CPU: 1
> > GPR00: C00000000002F7C8 C00000003FFCB350 C0000000006518C0 00000000000001BC
> > GPR04: 000000003FE48080 0000000000000300 C000000003DF4000 0000000000000300
> > GPR08: C0000000006578A8 C00000077FFEF080 C000000000657928 000000000003FE48
> > GPR12: C000000000650000 C000000000557800 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> > GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> > GPR20: 0000000000230000 0000000003A10000 0000000000000060 0000000000000001
> > GPR24: 0000000000000400 C00000003FFB5000 C000000003DF2830 C000000003DF2000
> > GPR28: 0000000ADC7D4C2D 00000000000001BC 00007FC901000FB9 00007FC9010003B9
> > NIP [C00000000002F4A4] .hash_page_do_lazy_icache+0x3c/0x108
> > LR [C00000000002F7C8] .__hash_page_4K+0x98/0xac
> > Call Trace:
> > [C00000003FFCB350] [C00000003FFCB540] 0xc00000003ffcb540 (unreliable)
> > [C00000003FFCB3E0] [C00000000002F7C8] .__hash_page_4K+0x98/0xac
> > [C00000003FFCB4E0] [C00000000002F444] .hash_page+0x158/0x17c
> > [C00000003FFCB560] [C000000000004734] .do_hash_page+0x34/0x40
> > --- Exception: 301 at .e1000_init_eeprom_params+0x40/0x314
> > LR = .e1000_probe+0x550/0x9f0
> > [C00000003FFCB850] [C00000000028E078] .pci_bus_read_config_word+0x94/0xe0 (unreliable)
> > [C00000003FFCB900] [C0000000004FC9A4] .e1000_probe+0x550/0x9f0
> > [C00000003FFCB9D0] [C000000000291494] .pci_device_probe+0x11c/0x16c
> > [C00000003FFCBA70] [C0000000002DEE50] .driver_probe_device+0x80/0x160
> > [C00000003FFCBB00] [C0000000002DEFD8] .__driver_attach+0xa8/0xc4
> > [C00000003FFCBB90] [C0000000002DE50C] .bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0xd0
> > [C00000003FFCBC40] [C0000000002DEC08] .driver_attach+0x28/0x40
> > [C00000003FFCBCC0] [C0000000002DDCAC] .bus_add_driver+0xd4/0x1ec
> > [C00000003FFCBD70] [C0000000002DF0D4] .driver_register+0x54/0x70
> > [C00000003FFCBE00] [C000000000291054] .pci_register_driver+0x80/0xc4
> > [C00000003FFCBE80] [C0000000004FC43C] .e1000_init_module+0x40/0x58
> > [C00000003FFCBF00] [C000000000009584] .init+0x1e8/0x44c
> > [C00000003FFCBF90] [C00000000000A358] .kernel_thread+0x4c/0x68
> > Instruction dump:
> > fb81ffe0 fba1ffe8 fbe1fff8 e902aef0 7c7d1b78 fbc1fff0 788ba302 f8010010
> > f821ff71 60000000 60000000 e92a0000 <7c0958ae> 78001f24 7d28002a 38000038
> > <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
>
> I'm going to need help understanding that trace. Was the crash in
> e1000_init_eeprom_params() or in hash_page_do_lazy_icache()? The former, I
> think?
>
> git-netdev-all.patch touches e1000, but I don't see any substantial changes
> in there.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-07 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-07 20:16 Panic on boot PPC64 / e1000 for 2.6.14-git10 & 2.6.14-mm1 Martin J. Bligh
2005-11-07 20:39 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-07 21:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2005-11-08 17:11 ` Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1131397866.4652.50.camel@gaston \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@mbligh.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.