From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Wilson G. Hein" Subject: Re: YAM/Tekk help Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:41:36 -0800 Message-ID: <1132198895.6068.2.camel@CO> References: <20051116151748.GN3241@goldengate.vpizza.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20051116151748.GN3241@goldengate.vpizza.org> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org I've also heard that there are issues with kiss mode using the internal modem in the D700. You might have better luck using the soundmodem and not the internal TNC. 73, Willie WJ3G On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 07:17, Jim Meehan wrote: > I'm trying to get two Linux systems talking to each other over 9600 bps packet. > Here's my setup: > > System 1: > Pentium 133 MHz running RedHat 8 > Kenwood TM-D700A /w integrated 9600 bps TNC > AX25 HW addr: W6XE-12 > IP addr 10.0.0.1 > > > System 2: > Soekris single-board computer running custom Linux mini-distro > Kernel version 2.4.20 > YAM 9600 bps modem > Tekk KS-900L radio > AX25 HW addr: W6XE-14 > IP addr 10.0.0.2 > > Problem 1: > > If I ping from either side, that machine sends out ARP requests endlessly. > If I do "ifconfig" on the other side, I can see the RX packet counter > incrementing, and in "listen" I can see the ARP requests being received. > But no ARP reply is ever sent. If I create a static ARP entries on both sides, > then the machines can find each other, and I can ping in both directions. > I guess it's not really such a problem to add static ARP entries on both sides, > since there won't be any stations other than these two. Would be nice to > know why ARP isn't working though. > > Problem 2: > > The link is not reliable. Right now, I've got the txdelay set to 300 ms on > both sides, and I'm still getting 3 or 4 percent packet loss with 64 byte > pings. If I increase that to 192 byte pings (which is a more realistic size > for real world data transfer) that goes up to ~ 12 percent packet loss. This > isn't really acceptable, especially since the two systems are just one room > away from each other at the moment. > > It looks like packets sent by the TM-D700A are received reliably by the > YAM/Tekk side, but packets going the other direction are prone to bit errors. > Since there are really no adjustments to make on the TM-D700A, I suspect that > something needs to be adjusted on the YAM/Tekk combo. There's one adjustment > on the YAM, for TX gain, and I've tried to adjust that for best reliability. > There are also a ton of trimmers and adjustments inside the Tekk, and I suspect > it needs to be realigned. There are pretty detailed tune-up instructions for > the Tekk radio here: > > http://www.guerrilla.net/reference/tekk/ks960_techman.html > > But I don't own the equipment necessary to make all the adjustments. > > Anyone in the SF bay area who has access to that gear who'd be willing to > help me tune up the Tekk radio? Any other suggestions on how to get the > YAM/Tekk combo tuned up and working more reliably? > > Thanks, > > Jim Meehan, W6XE > Oakland, CA > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html