From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: harry <harry@hebutterworth.freeserve.co.uk>
Subject: Re: USB virt 2.6 split driver patch series
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:34:47 +0000
Message-ID: <1132587287.31295.151.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1132579104.31295.110.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<20051121134940.GA25045@snarc.org>
	<1132581661.31295.134.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<m3br0d52ud.fsf@goldshmidt.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <m3br0d52ud.fsf@goldshmidt.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@cl.cam.ac.uk>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 17:26 +0000, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:

> Another style comment that I have is that I think that
> 
> struct xenidc_channel_struct {
> 	void (*submit_message)
> 	 (xenidc_channel * channel, xenidc_channel_message * message);
> 
> is inferior to
> 
> struct xenidc_channel_struct {
> 	void (*submit_message)(xenidc_channel * channel,
> 		               xenidc_channel_message * message);
> 
> in terms of readability.

Thanks.  Yes, I agree. I left it the way that Lindent formatted it but I will do it this way on the manual formatting pass.