All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeffm@suse.com,
	torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: remove s_old_blocksize from struct super_block
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 13:34:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1133609645.7989.3.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0512031058350.11664@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>

Hi Anton,

On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > The s_old_blocksize field of struct super_block is only used as a temporary
> > variable in get_sb_bdev(). This patch changes the function to use a local
> > variable instead so we can kill the field from struct super_block.

On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 11:02 +0000, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> s_old_blocksize used to be used to restore the blocksize after the 
> filesystem had failed to mount or had unmounted.  Not restoring this leads 
> to all sorts of problems since the blocksize may be set for example to 4k 
> but some userspace app may need it to be set to 1k or whatever.  There 
> used to be applications that failed which is why s_old_blocksize was 
> introduced and it used to restore the blocksize.
> 
> I have no idea why/when the restoring has been removed but chances are the 
> removal was wrong.  Now every file system will need to restore the 
> blocksize itself (as it used to be before s_old_blocksize and blocksize 
> restoral was introduced).  Except whoever removed the restoration failed 
> to fix up all file systems.  )-:

It was removed in this commit, I think:

http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/old-2.6-bkcvs.git;a=commit;h=294c42046966e927ef86c0d4ce71cff32d9b458c

			Pekka


  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-03 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-02 21:20 [PATCH] fs: remove s_old_blocksize from struct super_block Pekka Enberg
2005-12-02 21:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2005-12-03 11:02 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-12-03 11:34   ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2005-12-03 14:34     ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-12-03 17:42       ` Jeff Mahoney
2005-12-03 18:52       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1133609645.7989.3.camel@localhost \
    --to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jeffm@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.