From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] order>0 page freeing bug
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:02:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11354.1081864949@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040408122936.49a008d5.akpm@osdl.org>
> > (4) free_pages_check() complains that the second page is a bad_page
> > because its count is not 0 at that point.
>
> That doesn't sound right - if this was the case, each and every order>0
> page freeing would be generating warnings, would it not?
You'd've thought so, but I can't see why it should work on x86 either. I need
to do some more investigation, I suppose, but it's going to have to be May
before I can do that:-(
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-13 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-08 16:31 [PATCH] order>0 page freeing bug David Howells
2004-04-08 19:29 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-13 14:02 ` David Howells [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11354.1081864949@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.