From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mrenzmann@otaku42.de (Michael Renzmann)
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 14:45:12 +0000
Subject: [lm-sensors] project status and future
Message-Id: <1136299512.4455.113.camel@gimli>
List-Id: <lm-sensors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <43AF1E4A.90902@sh.cvut.cz>
In-Reply-To: <43AF1E4A.90902@sh.cvut.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org

Hi.

On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 15:05 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > I'd say no. While mediawiki might be more powerful regarding the markup
> > it uses, we will loose one of the features of Trac: the possibility to
> > easily link between tickets, wiki, changeset comments, and other Trac
> > objects.
> Is it really that helpful?

I'm quite used to it now, yes. It's a lot easier to refer to a fixed
ticket by just mentioning "#123" rather than by
"http://madwifi.org/ticket/123" in a commit message, for example.

> > Bottom line: personally I'd strongly vote for the Trac-internal wiki
> > rather than Mediawiki in this case.
> Well, as I said I personally prefer mediawiki, but I'm not insisting :)

I also won't insist. Let the majority decide that. :)

Bye, Mike