From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EuWl9-0006vu-Rq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:10:36 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EuWl4-0006vf-Oo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:10:34 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EuWl3-0006vb-Rh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:10:30 -0500
Received: from [195.167.226.133] (helo=alinto.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EuWme-00065x-Am
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:12:08 -0500
Message-ID: <1136473719.43bd3677d4726@webmail.alinto.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:08:39 +0100
From: octane indice <octane@alinto.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-smp guest on monoCPU host: big slowdown
References: <1136377601.43bbbf0178301@webmail.alinto.com>
	<41e41e7a0601041503i1ac4fd6dm6564cde12f74d21a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <41e41e7a0601041503i1ac4fd6dm6564cde12f74d21a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

En réponse à Hetz Ben Hamo <hetzbh@gmail.com> :
> ------------------ Début du message d'origine --------------------
> 
> Do u use KQEMU?
> 
Host: win2k. 
AFAIK, there is no kqemu for windows.

some others observations:
kernel crash at shutdown. Anybody interested by a stack trace?


> Hetz
> 
> On 1/4/06, octane indice <octane@alinto.com> wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm trying to use the new -smp option.
> > host: win2k
> > guest: linux 2.6.13-SMP
> >
> > The first sight is a really big slowdown.
> > with -smp 2, the guest seems to go approximatively to 1/4
> speed of a
> > monoCPU guest.
> >
> > I tried to boot with -smp 8, but it was so slow that I
> abandoned.
> >
> > Am I doing something wrong?
> > Is it unavoidable? Some options to use to compile qemu, or
> to
> > compile the SMP kernel?
> >
> > Thanks for all informations


---------------------------------------------
Alinto vous souhaite une très bonne année 2006 http://www.alinto.com