All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>
To: Weber Ress <ress.weber@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <slaby@liberouter.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Education
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:30:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1136813415.8412.0.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c2327970601090525v5548034fh780455513b50e8c0@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 11:25 -0200, Weber Ress wrote:
> When I say "more simple" kernel version, I would like say "more
> didactics" to teach.
> 
> thank´s to all replies.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Weber Ress
> 
> On 1/9/06, Jiri Slaby <slaby@liberouter.org> wrote:
> > Weber Ress napsal(a):
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > I´m starting a social project to teach kernel development for young
> > > students, with objetive of include these people in job market.
> > :)
> > >
> > > These studentes don´t have great skills in mathematical and computer
> > > science areas, but have great interest in development area. Some
> > > studentes have a little basic C language skills.
> > >
> > > Which are the first steps that I need in this project ?
> > prepare slides for teaching them real-world-(gc)c, not basic.
> > > Which´s the "more simple" kernel version to teach (2.2 ? 2.4 ? 2.6 ?).
well.. if they were ever to do anything useful with it, it would
basically have to be the newest, alot things have changed in 2.2 to 2.6.
> > IMHO 2.6 has the clearest api (specific(a) rather than sth. like
> > a->private->b->private.specific).
> > But in general it's hard to say this is the simplest one. In 2.2 there is less
> > code, than in 2.6 and so on
> >
> > regards,
> > --
> > Jiri Slaby         www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby
> > \_.-^-._   jirislaby@gmail.com   _.-^-._/
> > B67499670407CE62ACC8 22A032CC55C339D47A7E
> >
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-09 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-09 13:00 Kernel Education Weber Ress
2006-01-09 13:21 ` Jiri Slaby
2006-01-09 13:25   ` Weber Ress
2006-01-09 13:30     ` Kasper Sandberg [this message]
2006-01-09 16:59     ` Jiri Slaby
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.61.0601090805140.17451@chaos.analogic.com>
2006-01-11 18:42   ` Weber Ress
2006-01-11 20:37     ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-01-12  7:59     ` Peter Bortas
2006-01-13 22:37     ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-09 13:35 Khushil Dep

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1136813415.8412.0.camel@localhost \
    --to=lkml@metanurb.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ress.weber@gmail.com \
    --cc=slaby@liberouter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.