From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:28:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1136827695.9957.73.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060109171411.GB67773@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 18:14 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:53:35PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Does the Windows Explorer draw icons based only on name and metadata?
>
> >From what I can see it does icons on non-executable entirely based on
> the extension and nothing else on the first pass. Executables are
> looked inside for an icon (and there seems to be cache effects at
> times, especially visible on the desktop). Then for images a second
> pass generates icons depending on the contents (with, once again, a
> cache hidden somewhere).
>
> Not a bad strategy, too. Doing a file(1) on everything can only be
> slow given the random disk accesses it generates. Maybe a file(1) as
> a _second_ pass would work.
Gack, does Nautilus really do file(1) on everything? That's unspeakably
awful.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-09 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5t06S-7nB-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5t34G-3Zu-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5t5pU-7tD-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5t5JU-7Sn-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-01-09 14:18 ` Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time Robert Hancock
2006-01-09 14:28 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-01-09 15:15 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 16:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-01-09 16:04 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 16:14 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-01-09 16:19 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 16:29 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-09 16:41 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 16:53 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-01-09 16:56 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 17:14 ` Olivier Galibert
2006-01-09 17:28 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2006-01-09 19:35 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-01-10 10:32 ` File type by extension is evil (was Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time) Bernhard R. Link
2006-01-10 20:28 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 17:14 ` Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-09 17:31 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-09 16:45 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-01-09 17:33 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 18:11 ` Marcin Dalecki
2006-01-09 17:45 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-01-09 16:59 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-10 1:44 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-10 4:30 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-10 10:13 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-01-10 10:34 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-10 23:48 Lukas Hejtmanek
2006-01-10 23:57 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-11 0:02 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-09 7:54 Boxer Gnome
2006-01-09 8:06 ` Erik Andersen
2006-01-09 8:21 ` Boxer Gnome
2006-01-09 8:53 ` Jim Crilly
2006-01-09 9:07 ` Yaroslav Rastrigin
2006-01-09 10:22 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-09 11:03 ` Yaroslav Rastrigin
2006-01-09 12:45 ` CaT
2006-01-09 13:34 ` Yaroslav Rastrigin
2006-01-10 13:29 ` Helge Hafting
2006-01-10 16:29 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-11 2:29 ` David Nicol
2006-01-11 2:56 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-12 18:53 ` David Nicol
2006-01-12 21:05 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 13:36 ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-01-09 13:56 ` Yaroslav Rastrigin
2006-01-09 16:07 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-09 16:15 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 16:34 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-09 16:34 ` Olivier Galibert
2006-01-09 19:24 ` Diego Calleja
2006-01-09 19:33 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 13:54 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 14:32 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-09 15:22 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-01-09 19:07 ` Diego Calleja
2006-01-09 22:49 ` Dave Airlie
2006-01-10 12:00 ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-09 13:56 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-10 7:13 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-10 7:33 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-01-10 8:33 ` D. Hazelton
2006-01-10 10:49 ` Diego Calleja
2006-01-10 13:26 ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-01-11 4:57 ` D. Hazelton
2006-01-10 9:32 ` Yaroslav Rastrigin
2006-01-10 9:20 ` Yaroslav Rastrigin
2006-01-10 10:50 ` Diego Calleja
2006-01-09 16:32 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1136827695.9957.73.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=bernd@firmix.at \
--cc=galibert@pobox.com \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.