From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ps <Ps_Mail@freenet.de>
Subject: Re: Re: Wtr.: Re: 2.6.15.1+reiser4 Kernel Panic
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:10:31 +0000
Message-ID: <1138741832.19996.1.camel@ps.network.ps>
References: <E1F3vw4-0007bn-7V@www5.emo.freenet-rz.de>
	 <20060131162753.GB5539@favonius>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-27961-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <20060131162753.GB5539@favonius>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

have a look at http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/1/21/79

three people have damaged harddrives???

greets
Patrick

Am Dienstag, den 31.01.2006, 17:27 +0100 schrieb Sander:
> abc1237@freenet.de wrote (ao):
> > I don't think that this is an error of the Disc, because I have a
> > brand new Harddisk (2 day's old).
> 
> I once had four new disks, all DOA, each of them in a different way.
> 
> And last month nine, out of which two fail to pass 'badblocks'.
> 
> New disks are always a suspect as they don't have a proven track record
> yet (pun intended ;-).
> 
> 	Kind regards, Sander
>