From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Overlapped command error handling
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:31:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1138980685.2830.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43E323BA.8010604@suse.de>
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 10:34 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Can someone explain to my how having a queue depth of '2' in the non-TCQ
> case can be correct?
> If not, please apply the following patch. Oh, and aic7xxx suffers from
> the same problem, naturally.
Yes, the driver is supposed to be counting both the tagged and untagged
commands outstanding and return SCSI_MLQUEUE_DEVICE_BUSY if the
mid-layer tries to queue over that.
The premise of setting this to 2 is that we always have one command in
progress and one completely prepared ready to fire as soon as the
in-progress one returns. Jens has postulated that this is no-longer
necessary; we could simply reduce the queue depth to 1 for the non-TCQ
case. What this would do is transfer the setup work from the sending
process to the block softirq, so it might increase latency in the
non-TCQ case ... but no-one knows for sure.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-03 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-02 13:00 Overlapped command error handling Hannes Reinecke
2006-02-02 15:12 ` James Bottomley
2006-02-03 9:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2006-02-03 15:31 ` James Bottomley [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-03 11:00 Emmanuel Fusté
2006-02-03 11:13 Emmanuel Fusté
2006-02-04 17:01 Emmanuel Fusté
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1138980685.2830.7.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.