From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH]Make VTIdomain boot again
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 08:09:08 -0700
Message-ID: <1139497748.26420.240.camel@localhost>
References: <26F44F810A51DF42A127BC2A06BE185E03212D1A@pdsmsx404>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <26F44F810A51DF42A127BC2A06BE185E03212D1A@pdsmsx404>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Cc: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@intel.com>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 15:07 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
> Alex Williamson wrote:
> > itself.  Could we be setting some flag and adding the test to the
> > existing in_interrupt/local_softirq_pending check?  This looks rather
> > precarious.  Thanks,
> > 
> Alex:
> 	Will that be funny if we embed return_to_guest check in no
> matter in_interrupt() or local_softirq_pending() check? How about to add
> a new MACRO return_to_guest() and check in parallel with in_interrupt()
> and local_softirq_pending()?

   Yeah, that's what I was suggesting.  Thanks,

	Alex
-- 
Alex Williamson                             HP Linux & Open Source Lab