From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: RE: [BUNDLE] Testing a simpler inter-domain transport
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:47:56 +1100
Message-ID: <1139802476.5201.43.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <44BDAFB888F59F408FAE3CC35AB4704102FCD65E@orsmsx409>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <44BDAFB888F59F408FAE3CC35AB4704102FCD65E@orsmsx409>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "King, Steven R" <steven.r.king@intel.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 19:24 -0800, King, Steven R wrote:
> Sorry, quixotic as charged.  :^)  Your patch is one thing, multi-domain
> shared page LAN's are another.

That's OK, I was a little confused, that's all.

> If multi-domain shared page LAN's become more than a proof-of-concept
> for your patch, we can worry about it then.  You mention the DOS attack,
> but there are other problems that have no wired-LAN analog.

Agreed.  Although it's not a problem I'm losing sleep on.  At least with
virtual networks you can cheaply set up one LAN per pair.

Cheers!
Rusty.
-- 
 ccontrol: http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/ccontrol