From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.15-rt17
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:17:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1140650267.6396.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0602221621110.13737-100000@lifa03.phys.au.dk>
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 17:50 +0100, Esben Nielsen wrote:
> I didn't know anyone looked at my patch! I am ofcourse happy about it :-)
Was just delayed due to other work in progress.
> That was why I had _reversed_ the lock ordering relative to normal in the
> original patch: First lock task->pi_lock. Assign lock. Lock
> lock->wait_lock. Then unlock task->pi_lock. Now it is safe to refer to
> lock. To avoid deadlocks I used _raw_spin_trylock() when locking the 2.
> lock.
Stupid me. I messed that one up. Should show up in the next -rt
Thanks
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-22 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-21 15:55 2.6.15-rt17 Ingo Molnar
2006-02-21 16:11 ` 2.6.15-rt17 K.R. Foley
2006-02-21 16:21 ` 2.6.15-rt17 K.R. Foley
2006-02-22 7:51 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Ingo Molnar
2006-02-21 17:16 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Michal Piotrowski
2006-02-21 18:53 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Michal Piotrowski
2006-02-21 20:37 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-21 21:15 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Michal Piotrowski
2006-02-22 12:22 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Steven Rostedt
2006-02-22 13:47 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Michal Piotrowski
2006-02-24 6:38 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Ingo Molnar
2006-02-24 7:09 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Steven Rostedt
2006-02-21 17:23 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Timothy R. Chavez
2006-02-21 18:24 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Daniel Walker
2006-02-21 18:46 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Thomas Gleixner
2006-02-22 16:50 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Esben Nielsen
2006-02-22 23:17 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2006-02-25 17:11 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Esben Nielsen
2006-02-25 17:32 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Steven Rostedt
2006-02-25 21:29 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Esben Nielsen
2006-02-25 22:25 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Esben Nielsen
2006-02-26 15:14 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Steven Rostedt
2006-02-26 22:38 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Esben Nielsen
2006-02-27 7:15 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Steven Rostedt
2006-02-23 13:49 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Bill Huey
2006-02-23 13:53 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Ingo Molnar
2006-02-23 14:05 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Bill Huey
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-28 19:21 2.6.15-rt17 Karsten Wiese
2006-02-28 19:43 ` 2.6.15-rt17 Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1140650267.6396.6.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=simlo@phys.au.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.