From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751094AbWBZMlm (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:41:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751089AbWBZMlm (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:41:42 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:45269 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751080AbWBZMll (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:41:41 -0500 Subject: Re: RTL 8139 stops RX after receiving a jumbo frame From: Alan Cox To: John Zielinski Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <44012D53.30700@undead.cc> References: <44012D53.30700@undead.cc> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:46:05 +0000 Message-Id: <1140957965.23286.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sad, 2006-02-25 at 23:23 -0500, John Zielinski wrote: > I'm surprised that the switch actually let the jumbo packet through onto > a 100Mbit link. I'm going to see if I can find a non RTL 8139 card in > my parts bin and see what that one does. > > What's the normal behavior for overruns on an interface? Should drop the packet, but it may be triggering a driver path with a bug. Is this repeatable and with multiple 8139 cards /