From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:50:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1140994219.24141.197.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fym53g5m.fsf@hades.wkstn.nix>
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 22:32 +0000, Nix wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Al Viro moaned:
> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 09:46:32PM +0000, Nix wrote:
> >> (i.e., there's a reason that warning uses the word *might*.)
> >
> > The bug is in spewing tons of false positives, reducing S/N on that
> > warning to nearly useless level. Note that in this case actually
> > missing some would be more useful if what remains is less diluted
> > by crap.
>
> I think this might be <http://gcc.gnu.org/PR5035>.
>
Al posted a quite compelling analysis of this bug a while back that's
much better than anything in that bug report, of course I can't find it
right now.
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-26 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-26 16:21 Building 100 kernels; we suck at dependencies and drown in warnings Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 16:31 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 16:35 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 19:31 ` Dave Jones
2006-02-26 19:43 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 20:11 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 23:45 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-02-27 2:02 ` Pavel Machek
2006-02-26 19:30 ` Dave Jones
2006-02-26 17:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-26 17:29 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 17:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-26 18:08 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 17:38 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 18:21 ` Diego Calleja
2006-02-26 18:45 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 19:03 ` Diego Calleja
2006-02-26 20:42 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-26 20:44 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 21:46 ` Nix
2006-02-26 21:49 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 21:53 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-26 21:56 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-26 22:08 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-26 22:12 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-02-27 17:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-02-26 22:14 ` Al Viro
2006-02-26 22:32 ` Nix
2006-02-26 22:50 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2006-02-26 21:14 ` Grant Coady
2006-02-27 12:56 ` David Greaves
2006-02-28 10:30 ` Roman Zippel
2006-02-26 22:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-03-02 20:25 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1140994219.24141.197.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.