Re: [Bluez-devel] Big rename for the D-Bus API

[Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>]

Hi Johan,

> > I just came to the conclusion that using org.bluez.Device for the local
> > attached Bluetooth dongles etc. is not a good name. I would prefer to
> > use org.bluez.Adapter and start renaming everything before the next
> > release. Any comments?
> 
> I'm fine with that. The current naming is because of the "let's imitate
> hald interface" decision. However, if you change "Device" to "Adapter",
> then I think that the methods and signals in the Manager path should
> also change to using Adapter instead of Device (currently we have
> ListDevices, DefaultDevice, DeviceAdded and DeviceRemoved).

that is correct. It will be a BIG rename, but I think it is worth it and
we can use the Device interface for remote devices in the future.

Did you had a chance to look at the current code inside the CVS? Besides
two or three missing methods, everything has been implemented.

Regards

Marcel




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Bluez-devel mailing list
Bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bluez-devel