From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nils Toedtmann Subject: Re: xen-2.0 + linux-2.6.15? Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:12:32 +0100 Message-ID: <1141128753.17186.35.camel@localhost> References: <1141122327.17186.20.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Am Dienstag, den 28.02.2006, 10:43 +0000 schrieb Keir Fraser: > On 28 Feb 2006, at 10:25, Nils Toedtmann wrote: > > > I have a very stable xen-host with several domUs (uptimes > 300d). > > > > It's still 2.6.11.x + xen-2.0 and now i'd like to upgrade it to > > 2.6.15.4. I have to do that remotely, and xen-2.0 was absolutely ok for > > me (rock-solid!), so i'd like to stick with xen-2.0 for now. But the > > last Changeset of the xen-2.0-testing hg tree is 3520 from 2005-12-28, > > and it still wants linux-2.6.12. > > > > Do i have to choose between 2.6.12.x+xen-2.0 and 2.6.15.x+xen-3.0? > > > > What about a maintenance release 2.0.8 for linux-2.6.15 or upcoming > > -2.6.16? > > At the moment you have to make that choice. That's a choice between two evils ... any experiences comparing stability of 2.0 vs. 3.0? (Of cause there is no xen-3.0.x system with uptime>90d ;-) > It would be great if someone upgraded the 2.0 kernel, true > but the core developers are busy with 3.0. Comprehensible. So no xen-2 release on the roadmap? Then i'll have to move to xen-3, too many sec issues with < 2.6.15.4 :( /nils. ps: xen is great, thank you for this wonderful piece of software!