All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] libata: implement ata_dev_revalidate()
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:20:39 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11412012391678-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11412012393192-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>

ata_dev_revalidate() re-reads IDENTIFY PAGE of the given device and
makes sure it's the same device as the configured one.  Once it's
verified that it's the same device, @dev is configured according to
newly read IDENTIFY PAGE.  Note that revalidation currently doesn't
invoke transfer mode reconfiguration.

Criteria for 'same device'

* same class (of course)
* same model string
* same serial string
* if ATA, same n_sectors (to catch geometry parameter changes)

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>

---

 drivers/scsi/libata-core.c |  115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/libata.h     |    2 +
 2 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

5f157f520bce43bee189d18e0736065ce7997334
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
index 64e087b..d599e8f 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c
@@ -2341,6 +2341,120 @@ int ata_drive_probe_reset(struct ata_por
 	return rc;
 }
 
+/**
+ *	ata_dev_same_device - Determine whether new ID matches configured device
+ *	@ap: port on which the device to compare against resides
+ *	@dev: device to compare against
+ *	@new_class: class of the new device
+ *	@new_id: IDENTIFY page of the new device
+ *
+ *	Compare @new_class and @new_id against @dev and determine
+ *	whether @dev is the device indicated by @new_class and
+ *	@new_id.
+ *
+ *	LOCKING:
+ *	None.
+ *
+ *	RETURNS:
+ *	1 if @dev matches @new_class and @new_id, 0 otherwise.
+ */
+static int ata_dev_same_device(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *dev,
+			       unsigned int new_class, const u16 *new_id)
+{
+	const u16 *old_id = dev->id;
+	unsigned char model[2][41], serial[2][21];
+	u64 new_n_sectors;
+
+	if (dev->class != new_class) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING
+		       "ata%u: dev %u class mismatch %d != %d\n",
+		       ap->id, dev->devno, dev->class, new_class);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	ata_id_c_string(old_id, model[0], ATA_ID_PROD_OFS, sizeof(model[0]));
+	ata_id_c_string(new_id, model[1], ATA_ID_PROD_OFS, sizeof(model[1]));
+	ata_id_c_string(old_id, serial[0], ATA_ID_SERNO_OFS, sizeof(serial[0]));
+	ata_id_c_string(new_id, serial[1], ATA_ID_SERNO_OFS, sizeof(serial[1]));
+	new_n_sectors = ata_id_n_sectors(new_id);
+
+	if (strcmp(model[0], model[1])) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING
+		       "ata%u: dev %u model number mismatch '%s' != '%s'\n",
+		       ap->id, dev->devno, model[0], model[1]);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	if (strcmp(serial[0], serial[1])) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING
+		       "ata%u: dev %u serial number mismatch '%s' != '%s'\n",
+		       ap->id, dev->devno, serial[0], serial[1]);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	if (dev->class == ATA_DEV_ATA && dev->n_sectors != new_n_sectors) {
+		printk(KERN_WARNING
+		       "ata%u: dev %u n_sectors mismatch %llu != %llu\n",
+		       ap->id, dev->devno, (unsigned long long)dev->n_sectors,
+		       (unsigned long long)new_n_sectors);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+/**
+ *	ata_dev_revalidate - Revalidate ATA device
+ *	@ap: port on which the device to revalidate resides
+ *	@dev: device to revalidate
+ *	@post_reset: is this revalidation after reset?
+ *
+ *	Re-read IDENTIFY page and make sure @dev is still attached to
+ *	the port.
+ *
+ *	LOCKING:
+ *	Kernel thread context (may sleep)
+ *
+ *	RETURNS:
+ *	0 on success, negative errno otherwise
+ */
+int ata_dev_revalidate(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *dev,
+		       int post_reset)
+{
+	unsigned int class;
+	u16 *id;
+	int rc;
+
+	if (!ata_dev_present(dev))
+		return 0;
+
+	class = dev->class;
+	id = NULL;
+
+	/* allocate & read ID data */
+	rc = ata_dev_read_id(ap, dev, &class, post_reset, &id);
+	if (rc)
+		goto fail;
+
+	/* is the device still there? */
+	if (!ata_dev_same_device(ap, dev, class, id)) {
+		rc = -ENODEV;
+		goto fail;
+	}
+
+	kfree(dev->id);
+	dev->id = id;
+
+	/* configure device according to the new ID */
+	return ata_dev_configure(ap, dev, 0);
+
+ fail:
+	printk(KERN_ERR "ata%u: dev %u revalidation failed (errno=%d)\n",
+	       ap->id, dev->devno, rc);
+	kfree(id);
+	return rc;
+}
+
 static void ata_pr_blacklisted(const struct ata_port *ap,
 			       const struct ata_device *dev)
 {
@@ -4960,6 +5074,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sata_std_hardreset);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_std_postreset);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_std_probe_reset);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_drive_probe_reset);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_dev_revalidate);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_port_disable);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_ratelimit);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_busy_sleep);
diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
index 1aab218..1392d22 100644
--- a/include/linux/libata.h
+++ b/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -485,6 +485,8 @@ extern int ata_std_softreset(struct ata_
 extern int sata_std_hardreset(struct ata_port *ap, int verbose,
 			      unsigned int *class);
 extern void ata_std_postreset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *classes);
+extern int ata_dev_revalidate(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *dev,
+			      int post_reset);
 extern void ata_port_disable(struct ata_port *);
 extern void ata_std_ports(struct ata_ioports *ioaddr);
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
-- 
1.2.1



  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-01  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-01  8:20 [PATCHSET] libata: implement and use ata_dev_revalidate(), take #2 Tejun Heo
2006-03-01  8:20 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2006-03-03 22:39   ` [PATCH 3/4] libata: implement ata_dev_revalidate() Jeff Garzik
2006-03-01  8:20 ` [PATCH 1/4] libata: re-initialize parameters before configuring Tejun Heo
2006-03-01  8:20 ` [PATCH 4/4] libata: revalidate after transfer mode configuration Tejun Heo
2006-03-03 22:42   ` Jeff Garzik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-05  8:55 [PATCHSET] libata: implement and use ata_dev_revalidate(), take #3 Tejun Heo
2006-03-05  8:55 ` [PATCH 3/4] libata: implement ata_dev_revalidate() Tejun Heo
2006-02-15 10:02 [PATCHSET] libata: implement and use ata_dev_revalidate() Tejun Heo
2006-02-15 10:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] libata: implement ata_dev_revalidate() Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11412012391678-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.