From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
pwil3058@bigpond.net.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@elte.hu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, kenneth.w.chen@intel.com,
akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.16-rc5-mm2] sched_cleanup-V17 - task throttling patch 1 of 2
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 08:04:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1141455840.9482.19.camel@homer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200603041750.21484.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 17:50 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Saturday 04 March 2006 17:50, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Well Fudgecicles. Now you guys have gotten me aaaaall confused. Are
> > there cpus out there (in generic linux land) that have 16 bit integers
> > or not? 16 bit integers existing in a 32 bit cpu OS seems like an alien
> > concept to me, but I'm not a twisted cpu designer... I'll just go with
> > the flow ;-)
>
> All supported architectures on linux currently use 32bits for int. That should
> give you 2.1 seconds in nanoseconds. Sorry my legacy of remembering when ints
> were 8 bits coloured me.
Well that's a relief. I was getting all kinds of frazzled trying to
imagine the kernel not exploding on such a cpu.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-04 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-17 13:45 [patch 2.6.16-rc3-mm1] Task Throttling V9 MIke Galbraith
2006-02-24 20:29 ` [patch 2.6.16-rc4-mm1] Task Throttling V14 MIke Galbraith
2006-02-24 22:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-25 1:16 ` Peter Williams
2006-02-25 2:20 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-25 2:42 ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-25 2:57 ` Con Kolivas
2006-02-25 3:08 ` Nick Piggin
2006-02-25 3:35 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-02-25 2:23 ` MIke Galbraith
2006-03-03 10:43 ` [patch 2.6.16-rc5-mm2] sched_cleanup-V17 - task throttling patch 1 of 2 Mike Galbraith
2006-03-03 10:58 ` [patch 2.6.16-rc5-mm2] sched_throttle-V17 - task throttling patch 2 " Mike Galbraith
2006-03-03 23:58 ` [patch 2.6.16-rc5-mm2] sched_cleanup-V17 - task throttling patch 1 " Peter Williams
2006-03-04 4:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-04 21:37 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-05 4:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-05 6:54 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-04 2:33 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-04 5:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-04 5:24 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-04 5:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-04 5:40 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-04 5:54 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-04 6:05 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-04 6:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-04 6:50 ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-04 7:04 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2006-03-05 22:29 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-04 21:44 ` Peter Williams
2006-03-04 10:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-02-26 11:26 ` [patch 2.6.16-rc4-mm1] Task Throttling V14 Daniel K.
2006-02-26 13:19 ` MIke Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1141455840.9482.19.camel@homer \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.