From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Ben Collins <bcollins@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Tomasz Torcz <zdzichu@irc.pl>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:52:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1141937556.13319.64.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141935002.6072.40.camel@grayson>
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 15:10 -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> The difference between our 2.6.15 386 and 686 kernels is actually pretty
> huge. The 386 is M486, and UP, while our 686 kernel is M686, and SMP.
> The SMP is also complicated by our use of the SMP-alternatives patch,
> but I believe I had this user test with this disabled (kernel command
> line option that leaves all the SMP code intact for testing). It didn't
> alter the problem.
Ubuntu doesn't provide a UP 686 kernel?
Isn't there a performance hit running an SMP kernel on UP?
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-09 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-06 22:35 State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5 Greg KH
2006-03-06 22:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-03-06 23:00 ` Greg KH
2006-03-08 22:26 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-08 22:50 ` Greg KH
2006-03-08 23:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-08 23:18 ` Greg KH
2006-03-08 23:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-09 18:40 ` Tomasz Torcz
2006-03-09 19:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-09 20:10 ` Ben Collins
2006-03-09 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-15 16:03 ` Ben Collins
2006-03-09 20:52 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2006-03-09 21:06 ` SMP on UP (Was Re: State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5) Ben Collins
2006-03-09 21:47 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-09 21:07 ` State of the Linux PCI and PCI Hotplug Subsystems for 2.6.16-rc5 David S. Miller
2006-03-09 20:37 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-09 20:46 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-09 21:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-08 23:29 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-08 23:45 ` Dave Hansen
2006-03-08 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-09 10:24 ` Martin MOKREJŠ
2006-03-08 23:05 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-08 23:18 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-08 23:23 ` Greg KH
2006-03-08 23:34 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-08 23:40 ` Greg KH
2006-03-09 0:03 ` Lee Revell
2006-03-08 23:21 ` Greg KH
2006-03-09 4:01 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2006-03-09 5:34 ` Greg KH
2006-03-09 5:11 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1141937556.13319.64.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bcollins@ubuntu.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=zdzichu@irc.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.