From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Revell Subject: Re: Ludicrous amount of spam on this list Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:50:00 -0500 Message-ID: <1142279401.13256.18.camel@mindpipe> References: <1142276619.9235.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1142278013.13256.10.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mustang.oldcity.dca.net (mustang.oldcity.dca.net [216.158.38.3]) by alsa.jcu.cz (ALSA's E-mail Delivery System) with SMTP id D94B71D7 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 20:50:05 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Adrian McMenamin , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 20:42 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Well, but it's true that the amount of spam from alsa-devel is much > more than from LKML. (It's still acceptable to me, though.) I think the spam mails are close in number but the much greater LKML volume drowns it out. It does seem that we should be able to do a little better, like loweing the spam score threshold, which IIRC can be done via the Mailman interface. How about simply filtering out all HTML mail like LKML does? Lee ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642