From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Stekloff <dsteklof@us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: xm-test failures?
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:01:31 -0800
Message-ID: <1142434892.5339.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <2BF508F394C196468CCBEC031320DCDFA9DF08@pdsmsx405>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <2BF508F394C196468CCBEC031320DCDFA9DF08@pdsmsx405>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "Yu, Ping Y" <ping.y.yu@intel.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 16:23 +0800, Yu, Ping Y wrote:
> >From our test in VMX, it is fine in latest change set 9238.


Anthony was referring to non-HVM testing, which is seeing failures with
block-attach and migrate tests. These tests are SKIP'd on HVM because it
needs infrastructure for block-attach that isn't there yet and migrate
won't yet work with HVM.

You are right, HVM passes the tests well it does run. Yesterday on
cs9236, I ran with only 3 XFAILS - the network ping tests that are known
problems - as the only errors.

So, it's time to add more tests and support for HVM in xm-test. Any help
is appreciated.

Thanks,

Dan




> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
> >[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Li=
guori
> >Sent: 2006=E5=B9=B43=E6=9C=8815=E6=97=A5 7:06
> >To: xen-devel
> >Subject: [Xen-devel] xm-test failures?
> >
> >There seems to be a large number of xm-test failures in current tip.  =
Is
> >anyone else seeing this (~15 FAILs).  I'm attempting to figure out wha=
t
> >changeset broke things.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Anthony Liguori
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Xen-devel mailing list
> >Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel