From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Stekloff Subject: Re: [PATCH][xm-test] Repost of tpm driver suspend/resume test Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:14:29 -0800 Message-ID: <1142435669.5339.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1142360879.5335.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060315095841.GB20619@leeni.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060315095841.GB20619@leeni.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ewan Mellor Cc: danms@us.ibm.com, Woody Marvel , Stefan Berger , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 09:58 +0000, Ewan Mellor wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:27:59PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > This is a repost of a previously posted patch to test suspend and resume > > cycles of the TPM front- and backend. > > Now that sysfs is mounted in the RAM disk of the test environment, the > > test code does not need to do this anymore. This patch also simplifies > > previous tests and the APIs used there. > > Woody Marvel and Dan Stekloff still seem to be discussing the best way to > detect sysfs capabilities. I presume your patch depends upon Dan's, and I've > been holding that off until I get a sysfs-detection patch that everyone's > happy with. Hi Ewan, Please put the sysfs patch in as is, Woody is fine with it. Thanks, Dan