All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [2.6.16-rc6 patch] fix interactive task starvation
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 06:50:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1142661030.8937.7.camel@homer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060317211529.26969a16.akpm@osdl.org>

On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 21:15 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> > +#define EXPIRED_STARVING(rq) \
> >  +	((STARVATION_LIMIT && ((rq)->expired_timestamp && \
> >  +		(jiffies - (rq)->expired_timestamp >= \
> >  +			STARVATION_LIMIT * ((rq)->nr_running) + 1))) || \
> >  +			((rq)->curr->static_prio > (rq)->best_expired_prio))
> 
> Does this have to be a macro?
> 

I suppose not, now inlined.

	-Mike

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>

--- linux-2.6.16-rc6/kernel/sched.c.org	2006-03-17 14:48:35.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc6/kernel/sched.c	2006-03-18 06:43:59.000000000 +0100
@@ -662,11 +662,36 @@
 }
 
 /*
+ * We place interactive tasks back into the active array, if possible.
+ *
+ * To guarantee that this does not starve expired tasks we ignore the
+ * interactivity of a task if the first expired task had to wait more
+ * than a 'reasonable' amount of time. This deadline timeout is
+ * load-dependent, as the frequency of array switched decreases with
+ * increasing number of running tasks. We also ignore the interactivity
+ * if a better static_prio task has expired:
+ */
+static inline int expired_starving(runqueue_t *rq)
+{
+	int limit = STARVATION_LIMIT * rq->nr_running, starving;
+
+	if (!limit || !rq->expired_timestamp)
+		return 0;
+	starving = jiffies - rq->expired_timestamp >= limit;
+	starving += rq->curr->static_prio > rq->best_expired_prio;
+
+	return starving;
+}
+
+/*
  * __activate_task - move a task to the runqueue.
  */
 static inline void __activate_task(task_t *p, runqueue_t *rq)
 {
-	enqueue_task(p, rq->active);
+	prio_array_t *array = rq->active;
+	if (unlikely(expired_starving(rq)))
+		array = rq->expired;
+	enqueue_task(p, array);
 	rq->nr_running++;
 }
 
@@ -2461,22 +2486,6 @@
 }
 
 /*
- * We place interactive tasks back into the active array, if possible.
- *
- * To guarantee that this does not starve expired tasks we ignore the
- * interactivity of a task if the first expired task had to wait more
- * than a 'reasonable' amount of time. This deadline timeout is
- * load-dependent, as the frequency of array switched decreases with
- * increasing number of running tasks. We also ignore the interactivity
- * if a better static_prio task has expired:
- */
-#define EXPIRED_STARVING(rq) \
-	((STARVATION_LIMIT && ((rq)->expired_timestamp && \
-		(jiffies - (rq)->expired_timestamp >= \
-			STARVATION_LIMIT * ((rq)->nr_running) + 1))) || \
-			((rq)->curr->static_prio > (rq)->best_expired_prio))
-
-/*
  * Account user cpu time to a process.
  * @p: the process that the cpu time gets accounted to
  * @hardirq_offset: the offset to subtract from hardirq_count()
@@ -2611,7 +2620,7 @@
 
 		if (!rq->expired_timestamp)
 			rq->expired_timestamp = jiffies;
-		if (!TASK_INTERACTIVE(p) || EXPIRED_STARVING(rq)) {
+		if (!TASK_INTERACTIVE(p) || expired_starving(rq)) {
 			enqueue_task(p, rq->expired);
 			if (p->static_prio < rq->best_expired_prio)
 				rq->best_expired_prio = p->static_prio;



  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-18  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-18  5:08 [2.6.16-rc6 patch] fix interactive task starvation Mike Galbraith
2006-03-18  5:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-18  5:50   ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2006-03-18  6:22     ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-18  7:29       ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-18  7:33         ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-18  7:48           ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-18  7:52             ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-18  8:51         ` Ingo Molnar
2006-03-18  8:05 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-18  8:15   ` Con Kolivas
2006-03-18  9:43     ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-18  8:52   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1142661030.8937.7.camel@homer \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.