From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
To: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rt1
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:31:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1143048688.9127.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <442176EB.1050403@cybsft.com>
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 10:10 -0600, K.R. Foley wrote:
> Found something interesting. Having Wakeup latency timing turned on
> makes a HUGE difference. I turned it off and recompiled and now I am
> seeing numbers back in line with what I expected from 2.6.16-rt4. Sorry,
> but I had no idea it would make that much difference. I don't have a
> complete run yet, but I have seen enough to know that I am not seeing
> tons of missed interrupts and the highest reported latency thus far is
> 61 usec.
Just Wakeup latency timing , and not latency tracing ?
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-22 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-20 8:51 2.6.16-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2006-03-21 4:24 ` 2.6.16-rt1 K.R. Foley
2006-03-21 21:16 ` 2.6.16-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2006-03-22 2:26 ` 2.6.16-rt1 K.R. Foley
2006-03-22 6:29 ` 2.6.16-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2006-03-22 14:18 ` 2.6.16-rt1 K.R. Foley
2006-03-22 16:10 ` 2.6.16-rt1 K.R. Foley
2006-03-22 17:31 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2006-03-22 20:51 ` 2.6.16-rt1 K.R. Foley
2006-03-23 3:13 ` 2.6.16-rt1 Steven Rostedt
2006-03-21 13:30 ` 2.6.16-rt1 Serge Noiraud
2006-03-21 13:59 ` 2.6.16-rt1 Jan Altenberg
2006-03-21 17:01 ` 2.6.16-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2006-03-21 18:36 ` 2.6.16-rt1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-03-21 20:24 ` 2.6.16-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2006-03-21 23:22 ` 2.6.16-rt1 Michal Piotrowski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-22 9:59 2.6.16-rt1 Sébastien Dugué
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1143048688.9127.2.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=kr@cybsft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.