From: Michael Ellerman <michaelellerman@internode.on.net>
To: Haren Myneni <haren@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: _machine removal breaks kexec?
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 07:40:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1144129248.29756.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44316705.1040202@us.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 11:18 -0700, Haren Myneni wrote:
> Basically, kexec-tools looks the platform property to determine whether
> to read tce-base, tce-size and htab-* properties. The attached patch
> find out the platform info based on /proc/device-tree/chosen/htab-base
> property. Not tested yet.
Why don't we get rid of the platform variable entirely in kexec-ppc64.c,
if the tce-* and htab-* properties are there, then we read them, if not
we don't.
There's also:
if (platform == PLATFORM_PSERIES) {
if (rmo_top > 0x30000000UL)
rmo_top = 0x30000000UL;
}
I'm not sure where that number comes from, perhaps we need to export the
RMO value like we do for the htab?
While we're there that code could use a function to read
a /proc/device-tree file and do error handling, there's a lot of
duplicate code at the moment.
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
IBM OzLabs
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-04 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-03 1:40 _machine removal breaks kexec? Anton Blanchard
2006-04-03 16:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-04-03 17:32 ` Kumar Gala
2006-04-03 18:18 ` Haren Myneni
2006-04-04 5:40 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2006-04-04 6:15 ` Haren Myneni
2006-04-04 12:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2006-04-03 23:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2006-04-04 0:43 ` Kumar Gala
2006-04-04 12:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1144129248.29756.7.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=michaelellerman@internode.on.net \
--cc=haren@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.