From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C00679E1 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2006 22:10:54 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: _machine removal breaks kexec? From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <1078253E-4B9E-4432-86E3-82B01A4B68D1@kernel.crashing.org> References: <20060403014044.GA4704@krispykreme> <1144080994.4449.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1078253E-4B9E-4432-86E3-82B01A4B68D1@kernel.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:04:04 +0200 Message-Id: <1144152244.4449.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > uugh, can we make kexec not depend on something that embedded systems > would also have. Embedded systems will have hypertas ? ugh .. Ben.