From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965004AbWDHDBh (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2006 23:01:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965003AbWDHDBh (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2006 23:01:37 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55]:23706 "EHLO ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965000AbWDHDBh (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Apr 2006 23:01:37 -0400 Subject: Re: RT task scheduling From: Steven Rostedt To: Bill Huey Cc: Darren Hart , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "Stultz, John" , Peter Williams , "Siddha, Suresh B" , Nick Piggin In-Reply-To: <20060407233631.GA17574@gnuppy.monkey.org> References: <200604052025.05679.darren@dvhart.com> <200604070756.21625.darren@dvhart.com> <20060407210633.GA15971@gnuppy.monkey.org> <200604071537.38044.dvhltc@us.ibm.com> <20060407233631.GA17574@gnuppy.monkey.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 23:01:22 -0400 Message-Id: <1144465282.30689.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bill, I'm just catching up on this thread. Is your main concern that a High prio task is going to be unnecessary delayed because there's a lower RT task on the same CPU and time is needed to push it off to another CPU? It's late, so forgive me if this is a stupid question ;) On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 16:36 -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > > Has this cleared some things up? If not, let me know what else needs > > clarification. > > Yes, but you should really work to clarify terminology. Is this better ? Goes both ways :) -- Steve PS. It's really good to see you back on LKML. I've missed your posts.